관리-도구

편집 파일: 1776537069.M449499P2856004.cp-biz03.syd05.ds.network,S=8813,W=8964

Envelope-to: tony@galaxybeads.com.au
Delivery-date: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 04:31:09 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Grace Martin" <gracemartinboostweb@gmail.com>
Reply-To: gracemartinboostweb@gmail.com
To: tony@galaxybeads.com.au
Subject: Get found in your area and turn that into real customers
Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 23:58:13 +0530
Message-ID: <19848406901952277918778@DESKTOP-ER1GNVT>
 
 Content preview: Hi, Not sure if this is something youre focusing on right
 now, but I spent a bit of time on your site earlier and had a look at how
 its appearing in search. It seems like its not showing up as often as
 it could for some of the searches your customers would normally use. 
 
 Content analysis details: (6.8 points, 8.5 required)
 
 pts rule name description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 1.0 FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD 'From' gmail.com does not match 'Received'
 headers
 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is
 CUSTOM_MED
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
 provider
 [gracemartinboostweb[at]gmail.com]
 1.5 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
 query to Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
 for more information.
 [162.248.100.196 listed in sa-accredit.habeas.com]
 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
 query to Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243
 for more information.
 [162.248.100.196 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
 2.0 PYZOR_CHECK Listed in Pyzor
 (https://pyzor.readthedocs.io/en/latest/)
 0.2 KAM_DMARC_NONE DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message
 and the domain has no DMARC policy
 0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment
 0.0 FSL_BULK_SIG Bulk signature with no Unsubscribe
 1.2 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing
 list
 0.0 SPOOFED_FREEMAIL No description available.
 0.7 SPOOF_GMAIL_MID From Gmail but it doesn't seem to be...
X-Spam-Flag: NO

<HTML xmlns:o =3D "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dwindows-1252" http-equiv=3DContent-Ty=
pe>
<META name=3DGENERATOR content=3D"MSHTML 11.00.10570.1001"></HEAD>
<BODY>
Hi,<o:p></o:p>
<o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>
Not sure if this is =
something you=92re focusing on right now, but I spent a bit of time on your=
 site earlier and had a look at how it=92s appearing in search.<o:p></o:p><=
/SPAN>
<o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>
It seems like it=92s=
 not showing up as often as it could for some of the searches your customer=
s would normally use.<o:p></o:p>
<o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>
That=92s usually dow=
n to a few small gaps in how the site is set up =97 nothing major, but enou=
gh to affect visibility.<o:p></o:p>
<o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>
When those areas are=
 adjusted, the flow of enquiries tends to become more consistent.<o:p></o:p=
>
I=92ve been working=
 through similar situations with a few businesses recently, keeping things =
fairly straightforward.<o:p></o:p>
<o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>
If it=92s useful, =
I can put together a short overview of what I noticed and what I=92d look a=
t first.<o:p></o:p>
<o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>
Thanks and regards=
, Grace Martin<o:p></o:p></=
P>
<o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>
P.S. No pressure either way =97 if it=92s not something =
you=92re interested in, just let me know and I won=92t follow up.<o:p></o:p=
></BODY></HTML>